>>1252091 @ Glovelove
I have now worked my way through them again. All should now be ready.
I agree with you, in principle the character design on a cardboard box or in a manual is sufficient for most people.
So I looked for other names and really only found one work on E/Ex and that hasn't even been translated.
g/1632024/628deee8ca/ どらごん☆ぷりんせす~竜の肉便姫~
In my eyes, nothing stands in the way.
Well it sounds like EH just mistagged the gallery you mentioned, which is not uncommon, taggers also treat stuff as a generic series tag when it's against the rules there and taggers never quite catch up on cleaning that.
I'd prefer if stuff where the Fire Emblem / ファイアーエムブレム is actually valid on EH still has a specific tag if people do only want to see characters from that (story has little to do with it in my experience, even for super old stuff, is a bunch of pixels look fappable to people its going to get porn regardless of plot). As long as the generic series tag does not get in the way of that it can co-exist.
Looks like the system is automatically adding the type change where it shouldn't be, as Parody isn't even in the dropdown for fixing that.
I have now worked my way through them again. All should now be ready.
I agree with you, in principle the character design on a cardboard box or in a manual is sufficient for most people.
So I looked for other names and really only found one work on E/Ex and that hasn't even been translated.
g/1632024/628deee8ca/ どらごん☆ぷりんせす~竜の肉便姫~
In my eyes, nothing stands in the way.
I'd prefer if stuff where the Fire Emblem / ファイアーエムブレム is actually valid on EH still has a specific tag if people do only want to see characters from that (story has little to do with it in my experience, even for super old stuff, is a bunch of pixels look fappable to people its going to get porn regardless of plot). As long as the generic series tag does not get in the way of that it can co-exist.